Photoshop Contest PhotoshopContest.com
Creative Contests. Real Prizes. Essential Resource.
You are not logged in. Log in or Register

 


Photoshop Contest Forum Index - Contests and Entries - The 2014 Head To Head Tournament - Reply to topic

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 14, 15, 16  Next

Tawiskaro

Location: New York

Post Tue Aug 05, 2014 7:00 pm   Reply with quote         


blue_lurker wrote:
Damn this bluelurker guy is in every H2H even when he dont compete.... Laughing


What? Not competing? The least you could do is whip together a Loser's Lounge.



I'll bring the grub.


.




DaVinci

Location: The Netherlands

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:41 am   Reply with quote         


Round 2 was great! Lots of space / robot entries Cool




Watch them Drift

Location: Connecticut

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:45 am   Reply with quote         


Best chop of the round has to go to that boat, or the police chase.




_________________
Drifter.

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:33 am   Reply with quote         


Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time Sad" entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.




TheShaman

Location: Peaksville, Southeast of Disorder

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:56 am   Reply with quote         


Watch them Drift wrote:
Best chop of the round has to go to that boat, or the police chase.


I agree. I LOVE the boat. too bad it didn't have a competitor.




_________________
T-shirt Designs: http://www.cafepress.com/TheShaman
Help fight breast cancer by becoming an enabler: http://www.cafepress.com/Pinkaholics
OneChiefRocker

Location: Republic of Seychelles

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 10:16 am   Reply with quote         


Good chops and themes...best of luck choppers!




_________________
And if I find out you go near my locker, I swear to God I'll give you a karate chop right in the head.
nevet

Location: Israel>Vancouver

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 1:08 pm   Reply with quote         


TheShaman wrote:
Watch them Drift wrote:
Best chop of the round has to go to that boat, or the police chase.


I agree. I LOVE the boat. too bad it didn't have a competitor.


I double agree.




_________________
Nine bucks at the craft store, hours of fun.
"remember life is nonsense so wear silly shoes." - Noel fielding
"Found a bouncy ball behind the couch. Nothing is getting accomplished today."

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 1:30 pm   Reply with quote         


Police chase for me was the best of the round.
Boat a far second. (for me) Smile

Good luck all!




billtvshow
Site Moderator

Location: North Carolina

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 3:11 pm   Reply with quote         


Yarilo wrote:
Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time Sad" entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.


#1: People have been posting "surrender" entries for a long time, it has kind of been an accepted norm. Cringer was only doing what most people have done in the case that they ran out of time for some unforeseen reason.

#2: Most of the time, these surrender entries have an opponent. When they do, voters typically don't bash the entrant or call them a douchebag, they congratulate the other entrant as the winner and move on. In this case, Cringer had no clue his opponent was not going to post and had no control over whether his opponent would post or not. Hence, he should be treated no differently than if his opponent had posted.

#3: That said, after discussing the situation with Cringer, he has agreed to give up his spot to the highest vote percentage runner up from this round (standard practice for double no show fill ins). Technically he didn't have to do this by the current rules, but he did.

#4: I am currently discussing a rules change with the mods that will essentially treat future surrender type entries as no shows.
glennhanna

Location: Eugene, Oregon

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:06 pm   Reply with quote         


I'll try to be general. Some light sources are mysterious.




OneChiefRocker

Location: Republic of Seychelles

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:39 pm   Reply with quote         


billtvshow wrote:
Yarilo wrote:
Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time Sad" entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.


#1: People have been posting "surrender" entries for a long time, it has kind of been an accepted norm. Cringer was only doing what most people have done in the case that they ran out of time for some unforeseen reason.

#2: Most of the time, these surrender entries have an opponent. When they do, voters typically don't bash the entrant or call them a douchebag, they congratulate the other entrant as the winner and move on. In this case, Cringer had no clue his opponent was not going to post and had no control over whether his opponent would post or not. Hence, he should be treated no differently than if his opponent had posted.

#3: That said, after discussing the situation with Cringer, he has agreed to give up his spot to the highest vote percentage runner up from this round (standard practice for double no show fill ins). Technically he didn't have to do this by the current rules, but he did.

#4: I am currently discussing a rules change with the mods that will essentially treat future surrender type entries as no shows.


Good post and thank you for explaining this. BTW, can we look into adding "titles" to entries? Gracias!




_________________
And if I find out you go near my locker, I swear to God I'll give you a karate chop right in the head.
Watch them Drift

Location: Connecticut

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:54 pm   Reply with quote         


OneChiefRocker wrote:
billtvshow wrote:
Yarilo wrote:
Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time Sad" entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.


#1: People have been posting "surrender" entries for a long time, it has kind of been an accepted norm. Cringer was only doing what most people have done in the case that they ran out of time for some unforeseen reason.

#2: Most of the time, these surrender entries have an opponent. When they do, voters typically don't bash the entrant or call them a douchebag, they congratulate the other entrant as the winner and move on. In this case, Cringer had no clue his opponent was not going to post and had no control over whether his opponent would post or not. Hence, he should be treated no differently than if his opponent had posted.

#3: That said, after discussing the situation with Cringer, he has agreed to give up his spot to the highest vote percentage runner up from this round (standard practice for double no show fill ins). Technically he didn't have to do this by the current rules, but he did.

#4: I am currently discussing a rules change with the mods that will essentially treat future surrender type entries as no shows.


Good post and thank you for explaining this. BTW, can we look into adding "titles" to entries? Gracias!


The problem with this is the risk of 'non-english speaking' peoples accents showing through in my opinion...making it easier to identify artwork...

Also, in my opinion titles add a dynamic that takes away from the chop...often they are used to describe a chop and its story (I do this myself all the time). I think the image alone should be able to do all of that. Especially in the H2H, it should be chop v. chop, not chop and title v. chop and title.




_________________
Drifter.
shane.e.randall

Location: Indiana, PA

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 5:29 pm   Reply with quote         


Watch them Drift wrote:
OneChiefRocker wrote:
billtvshow wrote:
Yarilo wrote:
Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time Sad" entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.


#1: People have been posting "surrender" entries for a long time, it has kind of been an accepted norm. Cringer was only doing what most people have done in the case that they ran out of time for some unforeseen reason.

#2: Most of the time, these surrender entries have an opponent. When they do, voters typically don't bash the entrant or call them a douchebag, they congratulate the other entrant as the winner and move on. In this case, Cringer had no clue his opponent was not going to post and had no control over whether his opponent would post or not. Hence, he should be treated no differently than if his opponent had posted.

#3: That said, after discussing the situation with Cringer, he has agreed to give up his spot to the highest vote percentage runner up from this round (standard practice for double no show fill ins). Technically he didn't have to do this by the current rules, but he did.

#4: I am currently discussing a rules change with the mods that will essentially treat future surrender type entries as no shows.


Good post and thank you for explaining this. BTW, can we look into adding "titles" to entries? Gracias!


The problem with this is the risk of 'non-english speaking' peoples accents showing through in my opinion...making it easier to identify artwork...

Also, in my opinion titles add a dynamic that takes away from the chop...often they are used to describe a chop and its story (I do this myself all the time). I think the image alone should be able to do all of that. Especially in the H2H, it should be chop v. chop, not chop and title v. chop and title.


Agreed, I vote no on Proposition 342-A.1.1 to add titles to the H2H contestant entries.

But I do believe Sen. Watch them drift's comment about "non-English speaking" peoples is politically incorrect.
He should have stated "Non Merican speaking" got dang aliens from outer space!




_________________
<iframe></iframe>
karlymango

Location: Manila, Philippines

Post Wed Aug 06, 2014 11:14 pm   Reply with quote         


I agree that round 2 rocks!!! I guess round three will be a war...




anfa

Location: Geordieland, UK

Post Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:59 am   Reply with quote         


shane.e.randall wrote:
Watch them Drift wrote:
OneChiefRocker wrote:
billtvshow wrote:
Yarilo wrote:
Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time Sad" entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.


#1: People have been posting "surrender" entries for a long time, it has kind of been an accepted norm. Cringer was only doing what most people have done in the case that they ran out of time for some unforeseen reason.

#2: Most of the time, these surrender entries have an opponent. When they do, voters typically don't bash the entrant or call them a douchebag, they congratulate the other entrant as the winner and move on. In this case, Cringer had no clue his opponent was not going to post and had no control over whether his opponent would post or not. Hence, he should be treated no differently than if his opponent had posted.

#3: That said, after discussing the situation with Cringer, he has agreed to give up his spot to the highest vote percentage runner up from this round (standard practice for double no show fill ins). Technically he didn't have to do this by the current rules, but he did.

#4: I am currently discussing a rules change with the mods that will essentially treat future surrender type entries as no shows.


Good post and thank you for explaining this. BTW, can we look into adding "titles" to entries? Gracias!


The problem with this is the risk of 'non-english speaking' peoples accents showing through in my opinion...making it easier to identify artwork...

Also, in my opinion titles add a dynamic that takes away from the chop...often they are used to describe a chop and its story (I do this myself all the time). I think the image alone should be able to do all of that. Especially in the H2H, it should be chop v. chop, not chop and title v. chop and title.


Agreed, I vote no on Proposition 342-A.1.1 to add titles to the H2H contestant entries.

But I do believe Sen. Watch them drift's comment about "non-English speaking" peoples is politically incorrect.
He should have stated "Non Merican speaking" got dang aliens from outer space!

It's a bit early to be hitting the drink, mate. You have a problem. Wink




_________________

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 14, 15, 16  Next

Photoshop Contest Forum Index - Contests and Entries - The 2014 Head To Head Tournament - Reply to topic

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Navigate PSC
Contests open  completed  winners  prizes  events  rules  rss 
Galleries votes  authentic  skillful  funny  creative  theme  winners 
Interact register  log in/out  forum  chat  user lookup  contact 
Stats monthly leaders  hall of fame  record holders 
PSC advantage  news (rss)  faq  about  links  contact  home 
Help faq  search  new users  tutorials  contact  password 

Adobe, the Adobe logo, Adobe Photoshop, Creative Suite and Illustrator are registered trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Text and images copyright © 2000-2006 Photoshop Contest. All rights reserved.
A venture of ExpertRating.com