was that supposed to be funny?
come on! you can do better than that!

Aliased's water reflection Tut is one of my favorite Tuts. Most Tutorials I find pretty useless. That was the best one I had seen in a while. Most Tuts you find on the web have a cheesy look to the finished product. This was the first time I used it and I had a lot of fun.Thanks Aliased (Where ever you are?)
http://photoshopcontest.com/view-entry/97201/oops.html

I later used it here with some tweaks.
http://photoshopcontest.com/view-entry/99559/no-fishing.html

This is my favorite tutorial. You dont get that cheesy look.
The guy who wrote this is such a talented artist.
AWESOME TUTORIAL!

Truly amazing!!!
I'm speechless........really.

I did read the original post. it had no links to any tutorial, and he could've been mentioning some tutorial he had used somewhere. It was a pretty vague description of which tutorial, to be honest, that's why I asked in the first place.

And I know what you were arguing about, I just asked why it was an argument, and not a discussion.

I thought i was clear enough...I guess my poor english is to blame
So, i'm trying again: I made this thread because i tested this well known tutorial written by "aliased" :http://photoshopcontest.com/tutorials/26/displacement-water.html
and after a while and a lot of mistakes that "aliased" helped me to correct through pm, i was finally able to put Paris under water...and my perspective was wrong...and i made corrections...and i made tests with real non-photoshopped photos because there was something i didn't understand...and the result was so obvious that i decided to share...and Chicken said something i didn't understand...and i will keep on using this excellent tutorial......and...and...arrrghhhh!!!!

Thank you ReyRey.
I haven't been here for a while, though I have been lurking (until recently, when I decided to participate in the logo contest.)

The tutorial was actually ment as an introduction and I planned to make aditional tutorials about the reflection of nearby objects and refraction. Like in some of these experiments: http://www2.apo.tudelft.nl/~alias/examples.html but I never got to it.

I'm not going to do them soon either because I have other priorities right now and I should really stay away from photoshop. (Actually I shouldn't be in the logo contest, but I thought "I'll just do one logo"...well, we all know how adictive photoshop is ...)

Anyway, you don't seem to need them.