Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:38 pm   Reply with quote         

Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:05 pm   Reply with quote         

Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:35 pm   Reply with quote         

Not to hurt your feelingS, but if someone butchered a nice muskrat like that and i saw it
an' noone was around, I'd set it on fire.
As far as the chop goes, good work

Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:45 pm   Reply with quote         

Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:38 pm   Reply with quote         

Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:38 pm   Reply with quote         

Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:40 pm   Reply with quote         

Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:43 pm   Reply with quote         

Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:47 pm   Reply with quote         

Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:47 pm   Reply with quote         

Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:58 pm   Reply with quote         

HAHAHAHAHAAH!!!!!
HILARIOUS!!!!!!



The rims look good though-- fresh rims-- ALWAyS NICE--CRAGARS ARE BORIN'

Mon Sep 19, 2005 8:04 pm   Reply with quote         

Mon Sep 19, 2005 8:19 pm   Reply with quote         

[quote="ScionShade"]HAHAHAHAHAAH!!!!!
HILARIOUS!!!!!!



Laugh all you want but here are the figures. As you can see from the list the stock mustang shelbys top out at less than 130. There are a few prototypes that could manage 142 but they were not standard models.

http://www.mustangmonthly.com/featuredvehicles/Shelby/

Maybe you guys should give this person a break. He wasn't trying to offend anyone, yet you dump all over him.

Mon Sep 19, 2005 8:23 pm   Reply with quote         

yeah, cars that do 6.5 in the quarter don't have the top end.
no major modifications need to switch that though- just switch out the pumkin ball fron the --i forget 0 I think its got a 365 tooth in the rear0 anyway switch that out for a 411 and you get speed--Dang fine car though.

Mon Sep 19, 2005 8:50 pm   Reply with quote         

_________________

_________________________________
THIS SITE REALLY DOESN'T EXIST
the way our EGO THINKS IT MIGHT!
_________________________________