Voting has ended, but you can still leave a comment
Votes
|
joelfreeman
...
|
|
|
Capella
...
|
|
|
Chukn8r
:)
|
|
|
PotHed
3d transform wouldn't be necessary. all that would be needed would be... uhh... brain fart... not skew... uhh... distort! yeah that one
|
|
|
Rondo
...
|
|
Comments
|
dewking
you could optimize this image down maybe to around 50-60k rather than being 164k by going to File-Save for web, then slide the quality bar down until you start to see a difference in quality, then save it. That may help in allowing everyone to enjoy your
|
|
|
spikeygreen
awesome concept, but you kinda just pasted in the spur...you should have used the 3d transform filter and other stuff and it would have been awesoem
|
|
|
|
jonnyblade
thanks for your comments. I will check out 3d trandform. and lower quality. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
[untitled entry]
|
by jonnyblade
Created March 20, 2004
5 votes
3 comments
w x h (8,588KB)
585 views
|
|
|
Like this contest?
|
