Photoshop Contest Forum Index - General Discussion - Of aliases, zombies, self inflicted spam, & stranger thi - Reply to topic
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next
As a paying member/customer I'd like this done about aliases |
Lock all alias accounts |
|
51% |
[ 32 ] |
Limit alias account access to only chat |
|
6% |
[ 4 ] |
Block alias accounts from voting |
|
11% |
[ 7 ] |
Block alias accounts from voting and posting |
|
11% |
[ 7 ] |
Allow alias accounts-do nothing |
|
19% |
[ 12 ] |
Total Votes: 62
Oscar
Location: Northern California
|
 Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:23 pm Reply with quote
I though you will notice Marco... but I'm just here for moral support, other than that i have no idea how to stop aliases. For all i know I'm a alias too.
Remember: Ya play with the bull, ya gonna get the horns.
|
marcoballistic
Location: I am everywhere, and Nowhere, but mostly, I am right here!
|
Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:44 pm Reply with quote
I am messing, we are driftin' off topic anyways... my fault sorry 
|
arcaico
Location: Brazil
|
Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:11 pm Reply with quote
ScionShade wrote: Showcase (...) You were very persuasive at getting Proc to change the chat box back to the bottom of the page---although nearly all the active chat users wanted it at the top, thanks.
OH!! So Show was the moron who made Proc put the chat box in the bottom?????? I KNEW there was a retard behind that!!!!
I love you too Show.
_________________
TheShaman wrote: fine fine! I'm an idiot!
|
Scooter
Location: Just Outside ShameLand
|
Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:40 pm Reply with quote
pleez pleez keel me know!!!
I don wanna leev know mor ! ! 
|
arcaico
Location: Brazil
|
Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:41 pm Reply with quote
Scooter wrote: pleez pleez keel me know!!!
I don wanna leev know mor ! !
yeah!!! KILL HIM!!! He canŽt even play the accordion!!!!
Stupid aliases!!! YouŽll never be reall people!! Ya hear me?? NEVER!!!!
_________________
TheShaman wrote: fine fine! I'm an idiot!
|
FootFungas
Location: East Coast!
|
Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:15 am Reply with quote
Joan of Arcadia wrote: Next thing you know, they will stitch yellow stars on our clothes...
Nah, we'll paint huge red a's on you. Stitching takes too long.
|
vokaris
Site Moderator
|
Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:34 am Reply with quote
marcoballistic wrote: I am messing, we are driftin' off topic anyways... my fault sorry While we're at it, let's also ban the practice of 20 people chopping under one screen name
coughmarcocough
|
Showcase
Location: A little town on the edge of Sanity
|
Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:39 pm Reply with quote
ScionShade wrote: I doubt we need a flame forum.
PSC drama is rarely that intense anymore.
The alias problem is that indeed...of active users a huge percentage are alias.Not just that, many of them have a huge chip on their shoulder and
have become a disruption as bad as the spam ever was.
Where do you find all this information? what proof do you have? Start listing them. Naming them will shut them up for fear of losing votes.
ScionShade wrote: TOFU!.perhaps you misunderstood, I was presenting the option that couple could still post--but only one person in household may use forums
and vote.
What about friends using the same library, at a college, in a business? what options do they have? only one student in an entire campus using the same internet connection can use the forums and vote? I think this is too limiting.
ScionShade wrote: Showcase, you havent been around much in awhile......
you sound like you're talking about a completely different site entirely.
BTW, even with alias voting the poll stands at 90% want aliases dealt with.
You were very persuasive at getting Proc to change the chat box back to the bottom of the page---although nearly all the active chat users wanted it at the top, thanks.
I have no idea what most of this is meant to say
First, I agree aliases should be dealt with. Its just not as cut and dry as most of you think it is. thats all. I'm sure Proc will work something out and try to help you all out.
Second, I wasnt persuasive. I simply said that me resolution of 1024x768 (A standard, widely used screen resolution) was not very agreeable with the text box at the top. With all of my toolbars and adress bars and status bars in my browser, I could see 1 line of chat comments under the text box if I remember correctly. Other people had a chance to add their input. Proc made up his own mind.
_________________
Don't be stupid
|
ReinMan
Location: Kingston, ONTARIO, CAN
|
Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:58 pm Reply with quote
Showcase wrote: ScionShade wrote: I doubt we need a flame forum.
PSC drama is rarely that intense anymore.
The alias problem is that indeed...of active users a huge percentage are alias.Not just that, many of them have a huge chip on their shoulder and
have become a disruption as bad as the spam ever was.
Where do you find all this information? what proof do you have? Start listing them. Naming them will shut them up for fear of losing votes.
ScionShade wrote: TOFU!.perhaps you misunderstood, I was presenting the option that couple could still post--but only one person in household may use forums
and vote.
What about friends using the same library, at a college, in a business? what options do they have? only one student in an entire campus using the same internet connection can use the forums and vote? I think this is too limiting.
ScionShade wrote: Showcase, you havent been around much in awhile......
you sound like you're talking about a completely different site entirely.
BTW, even with alias voting the poll stands at 90% want aliases dealt with.
You were very persuasive at getting Proc to change the chat box back to the bottom of the page---although nearly all the active chat users wanted it at the top, thanks.
I have no idea what most of this is meant to say
First, I agree aliases should be dealt with. Its just not as cut and dry as most of you think it is. thats all. I'm sure Proc will work something out and try to help you all out.
Second, I wasnt persuasive. I simply said that me resolution of 1024x768 (A standard, widely used screen resolution) was not very agreeable with the text box at the top. With all of my toolbars and adress bars and status bars in my browser, I could see 1 line of chat comments under the text box if I remember correctly. Other people had a chance to add their input. Proc made up his own mind.
If you didn't have that cute DILBERT av I'd kick your arse around a bit. 
But you DO have that cute DILBERT av - so you get a nice manly ReinHug!!!!!!!! 
_________________
_________________________________
THIS SITE REALLY DOESN'T EXIST
the way our EGO THINKS IT MIGHT!
_________________________________
|
ScionShade
Location: VeniceFlaUS
|
Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:13 pm Reply with quote
Showcase wrote: resolution of 1024x768 (A standard, widely used screen resolution) was not very agreeable with the text box at the top.
Our images are posted at 1280X960...guess what--yer the only person
to express a problem with it.
Everything else you said...........what?
|
Showcase
Location: A little town on the edge of Sanity
|
Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:48 pm Reply with quote
 you respond only to the chat format issue. heh.
its funny, I use a resolution of 1024x768 and never have any problems, nor do I look at any images larger than that on this site.
Why is the forum with set to 800 wide? because it accomodates all users on the interent (except those still at 640x480 which is probably just reinman).
I still would like to see some of this proof you have that half the active users on this site are aliases. anyone?
_________________
Don't be stupid
|
ReinMan
Location: Kingston, ONTARIO, CAN
|
Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:21 pm Reply with quote
Showcase wrote: you respond only to the chat format issue. heh.
its funny, I use a resolution of 1024x768 and never have any problems, nor do I look at any images larger than that on this site.
Why is the forum with set to 800 wide? because it accomodates all users on the interent (except those still at 640x480 which is probably just reinman).
Yeah, right.
41" BABY!!!!!!
You may not realize it, but even us Canadians know that WIDER is BETTER!
(er, um... as in SCREEN width, not ARSE width... unless you are a Black Canadian!  )
P.S. the above image has been optimized to an 800 pixel width so that Showcase can see the whole image on his teeny weeny wittle monitor. 
_________________
_________________________________
THIS SITE REALLY DOESN'T EXIST
the way our EGO THINKS IT MIGHT!
_________________________________
|
mightybeet
Site Moderator
Location: connecticut
|
Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:46 pm Reply with quote
ReinMan wrote: Showcase wrote: you respond only to the chat format issue. heh.
its funny, I use a resolution of 1024x768 and never have any problems, nor do I look at any images larger than that on this site.
Why is the forum with set to 800 wide? because it accomodates all users on the interent (except those still at 640x480 which is probably just reinman).
Yeah, right.
41" BABY!!!!!!
You may not realize it, but even us Canadians know that WIDER is BETTER!
(er, um... as in SCREEN width, not ARSE width... unless you are a Black Canadian! )
P.S. the above image has been optimized to an 800 pixel width so that Showcase can see the whole image on his teeny weeny wittle monitor.
but they dont match at all... how can you work in that environment?
_________________
L@rue: I'm eating a bag of bbq chips and drink a cocacola
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next
Photoshop Contest Forum Index - General Discussion - Of aliases, zombies, self inflicted spam, & stranger thi - Reply to topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
