so tru gref. I still think who voted for that image should admit it was a HUGE mistake and feel ashamed for a couple days!



P.S.: LOL@person switch

Man, I sleep through some of the best fights . . . . . I MUST be getting old.

OK, let's review,

Someone ripped off a Worth1000 entry and tried to pass it off as original here.

Supak0ma caught it, (nice job dude) started this thread and berates the members who voted for it.

A lot of people suddenly got involved and the fight was on.

Scion and supak0ma were confused with one another

Sandy bit Daddy Warbucks

Did I miss anything?



Same old, same old.

Look, I agree, the site is not nearly as active as it used to be, but for all you members who are complaining about that fact, let's hear some new ideas to make it better. How many of you completed nancer's survey, how many made positive suggestions?

One reason I think the site is not as active as it used to be is burn out. I mean, unless you're Marco how many ideas for chops can you come up with? And how many times do we all see a chop and the first thing that comes to mind is, "Been done to death." Sure, that's valid, but what's to be done about it? Let's hear some new ideas, folks, not the same old complaints about the site, the mods and the newby vs. old timers attitude. Got a problem here? Make it a freaking opportunity to make the site more fun and enjoyable for us all.

working on it Al, working on it.

And, another thought almost too frightening to contemplate, a long, long time ago, the vote totals were very low as a matter of course. Then everybody got more votes and vote totals went through the ceiling. Now they have dropped back down again.

Maybe the high vote period was just that, a period, and this level of vote activity is the norm.

Hey, I'm just sayin', it could be. Its just something to think about.

still think votes should be earned (each vote received is a vote you can give or something like that )

...

I don't understand?
The author (Supa that is, not Scion) said nothing really negative.




Anyway, I don't think it was meant to be a 'helpful' thread per se. I think it was meant to point out that several members voted for a stolen entry with no identifiable source whatsoever. It was meant to point out that people should look before they vote. I can't see any argument.....

can anyone send the image so I can see it. I was away these days so I want to know what happened?

Yes you can...

It did have the watermark crudely removed...

Ignore this post, just had to make it an even 100.

...

That was about the concerning entry, not the posts here in this thread

...

Perhaps you shouldn't consider this as a reprimande (which personally I do not belief this was the OP's intention), but as a wake up call (in general, not personally)