Photoshop Contest Forum Index - General Discussion - Best match in round 2. - Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
taker
Location: >Undergournd<
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:09 am Reply with quote
I think the best match in round 2 .
(Ivan Roujev vs koorio)
Only 1 vote . who agree with me .
|
charliesou
Location: Independent Scotland
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:25 am Reply with quote
Being the closest match don't make it the best match.
There were some real crackers. My pick would be Rosewood71 vs Tesore .
|
mellowdesign
Location: Location: Location:
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:27 am Reply with quote
Big congratulations to my opponent Roger1 and all the winners of this round!
Thank you to the handful who voted for my wasp (first chop for PC in two years!) - for the haters, it was ALL SOURCE *slightly affronted*!!!!!!! Lol!!!
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
|
taker
Location: >Undergournd<
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:29 am Reply with quote
charliesou wrote: Being the closest match don't make it the best match.
There were some real crackers. My pick would be Rosewood71 vs Tesore .
I know but it was the best Match to me .
|
supak0ma
Location: Photoshop Nation
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:31 am Reply with quote
nice job but the source is unrecognizable, that's why you've lost
|
mellowdesign
Location: Location: Location:
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:36 am Reply with quote
supak0ma wrote: nice job but the source is unrecognizable, that's why you've lost
I don't mind losing, just being doubted!!!
For me, it was about using the whole source to create something new and I thought it was pretty recognisable: sand for the pale body and limbs, the twists for the antenna, feet and sting, and the textures from the concrete for the dark wasp areas. I guess I made it too 'realistic', huh?
I look forward to seeing the entries in the next round!
|
supak0ma
Location: Photoshop Nation
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:38 am Reply with quote
mellowdesign wrote: supak0ma wrote: nice job but the source is unrecognizable, that's why you've lost
I don't mind losing, just being doubted!!!
For me, it was about using the whole source to create something new and I thought it was pretty recognisable: sand for the pale body and limbs, the twists for the antenna, feet and sting, and the textures from the concrete for the dark wasp areas. I guess I made it too 'realistic', huh?
I look forward to seeing the entries in the next round!
it was beautiful, this happened to me too so i know how you're feeling!
make sure the source is obvious in the H2H! or you're out!!
|
taker
Location: >Undergournd<
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:41 am Reply with quote
mellowdesign wrote: supak0ma wrote: nice job but the source is unrecognizable, that's why you've lost
I don't mind losing, just being doubted!!!
For me, it was about using the whole source to create something new and I thought it was pretty recognisable: sand for the pale body and limbs, the twists for the antenna, feet and sting, and the textures from the concrete for the dark wasp areas. I guess I made it too 'realistic', huh?
I look forward to seeing the entries in the next round!
I agree with supak0ma .and i think your use of the source is great but you can see theshaman work and use of the source his image is great. But you always can back . So see you next year.
|
mellowdesign
Location: Location: Location:
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:44 am Reply with quote
taker wrote: mellowdesign wrote: supak0ma wrote: nice job but the source is unrecognizable, that's why you've lost
I don't mind losing, just being doubted!!!
For me, it was about using the whole source to create something new and I thought it was pretty recognisable: sand for the pale body and limbs, the twists for the antenna, feet and sting, and the textures from the concrete for the dark wasp areas. I guess I made it too 'realistic', huh?
I look forward to seeing the entries in the next round!
I agree with supak0ma .and i think your use of the source is great but you can see theshaman work and use of the source his image is great. But you always can back . So see you next year.
Indeed! Thanks - will check out his work!
Perhaps I should have left it more like (it HAS been a while!!!):
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
|
mellowdesign
Location: Location: Location:
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:45 am Reply with quote
Quote: it was beautiful, this happened to me too so i know how you're feeling!
make sure the source is obvious in the H2H! or you're out!!
Good advice - thanks!
|
nyxxie
Location: Southern California
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:45 am Reply with quote
mellowdesign - amazing job, the only source I could notice was the sand, the antenna, the stinger and the little ends on the legs. It was hard to know whether or not ALL of it was source...
Anyway, mine was all source too. Here's my psd for anyone interested. https://www.box.com/s/cab543011f51d3c16824
|
mellowdesign
Location: Location: Location:
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:49 am Reply with quote
nyxxie wrote: mellowdesign - amazing job, the only source I could notice was the sand, the antenna, the stinger and the little ends on the legs. It was hard to know whether or not ALL of it was source...
Anyway, mine was all source too. Here's my psd for anyone interested. https://www.box.com/s/cab543011f51d3c16824
That was great - I loved it!
|
TheShaman
Location: Peaksville, Southeast of Disorder
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:54 am Reply with quote
supak0ma wrote: make sure the source is obvious in the H2H! or you're out!!
not exactly true. pretty sure mine was obvious. It was nothing but source
taker wrote: I agree with supak0ma .and i think your use of the source is great but you can see theshaman work and use of the source his image is great. But you always can back . So see you next year.
thanks taker. and even with that use it still lost.
apparently it wasn't interesting enough.
meh. I was happy with it.
All sources tend to be my downfall. I should have done more with some outside ocean or something. Needed that Xfactor IE: lasers coming out of his eyes or something like a 50 foot bird destroying some kids sandcastle to get this crowd motivated.
|
taker
Location: >Undergournd<
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:58 am Reply with quote
TheShaman wrote: supak0ma wrote:
make sure the source is obvious in the H2H! or you're out!!
not exactly true. pretty sure mine was obvious. It was nothing but source
I do not know what the mean of obvious.... But yes sure
|
TheShaman
Location: Peaksville, Southeast of Disorder
|
Fri May 18, 2012 9:59 am Reply with quote
taker wrote: TheShaman wrote: supak0ma wrote:
make sure the source is obvious in the H2H! or you're out!!
not exactly true. pretty sure mine was obvious. It was nothing but source
I do not know what the mean of obvious.... But yes sure
obvious.
obvious |ˈäbvēəs|
adjective
easily perceived or understood; clear, self-evident, or apparent :
as in: you could see my use of source easily.
Sand + Screws = Sandpiper Bird minus Xfactor = loss
|
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Photoshop Contest Forum Index - General Discussion - Best match in round 2. - Reply to topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|