Photoshop Contest Forum Index - Contests and Entries - The 2014 Head To Head Tournament - Reply to topic
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 14, 15, 16 Next
Tawiskaro
Location: New York
|
 Tue Aug 05, 2014 7:00 pm Reply with quote
blue_lurker wrote: Damn this bluelurker guy is in every H2H even when he dont compete.... 
What? Not competing? The least you could do is whip together a Loser's Lounge.
I'll bring the grub.
.
|
DaVinci
Location: The Netherlands
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:41 am Reply with quote
Round 2 was great! Lots of space / robot entries 
|
Watch them Drift
Location: Connecticut
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:45 am Reply with quote
Best chop of the round has to go to that boat, or the police chase.
_________________
Drifter.
|
|
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:33 am Reply with quote
Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time  " entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.
|
TheShaman
Location: Peaksville, Southeast of Disorder
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:56 am Reply with quote
Watch them Drift wrote: Best chop of the round has to go to that boat, or the police chase.
I agree. I LOVE the boat. too bad it didn't have a competitor.
|
OneChiefRocker
Location: Republic of Seychelles
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 10:16 am Reply with quote
Good chops and themes...best of luck choppers!
_________________
And if I find out you go near my locker, I swear to God I'll give you a karate chop right in the head.
|
nevet
Location: Israel>Vancouver
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 1:08 pm Reply with quote
TheShaman wrote: Watch them Drift wrote: Best chop of the round has to go to that boat, or the police chase.
I agree. I LOVE the boat. too bad it didn't have a competitor.
I double agree.
|
|
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 1:30 pm Reply with quote
Police chase for me was the best of the round.
Boat a far second. (for me) 
Good luck all!
|
billtvshow
Site Moderator
Location: North Carolina
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 3:11 pm Reply with quote
Yarilo wrote: Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time " entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.
#1: People have been posting "surrender" entries for a long time, it has kind of been an accepted norm. Cringer was only doing what most people have done in the case that they ran out of time for some unforeseen reason.
#2: Most of the time, these surrender entries have an opponent. When they do, voters typically don't bash the entrant or call them a douchebag, they congratulate the other entrant as the winner and move on. In this case, Cringer had no clue his opponent was not going to post and had no control over whether his opponent would post or not. Hence, he should be treated no differently than if his opponent had posted.
#3: That said, after discussing the situation with Cringer, he has agreed to give up his spot to the highest vote percentage runner up from this round (standard practice for double no show fill ins). Technically he didn't have to do this by the current rules, but he did.
#4: I am currently discussing a rules change with the mods that will essentially treat future surrender type entries as no shows.
|
glennhanna
Location: Eugene, Oregon
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:06 pm Reply with quote
I'll try to be general. Some light sources are mysterious.
|
OneChiefRocker
Location: Republic of Seychelles
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:39 pm Reply with quote
billtvshow wrote: Yarilo wrote: Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time " entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.
#1: People have been posting "surrender" entries for a long time, it has kind of been an accepted norm. Cringer was only doing what most people have done in the case that they ran out of time for some unforeseen reason.
#2: Most of the time, these surrender entries have an opponent. When they do, voters typically don't bash the entrant or call them a douchebag, they congratulate the other entrant as the winner and move on. In this case, Cringer had no clue his opponent was not going to post and had no control over whether his opponent would post or not. Hence, he should be treated no differently than if his opponent had posted.
#3: That said, after discussing the situation with Cringer, he has agreed to give up his spot to the highest vote percentage runner up from this round (standard practice for double no show fill ins). Technically he didn't have to do this by the current rules, but he did.
#4: I am currently discussing a rules change with the mods that will essentially treat future surrender type entries as no shows.
Good post and thank you for explaining this. BTW, can we look into adding "titles" to entries? Gracias!
_________________
And if I find out you go near my locker, I swear to God I'll give you a karate chop right in the head.
|
Watch them Drift
Location: Connecticut
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:54 pm Reply with quote
OneChiefRocker wrote: billtvshow wrote: Yarilo wrote: Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time " entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.
#1: People have been posting "surrender" entries for a long time, it has kind of been an accepted norm. Cringer was only doing what most people have done in the case that they ran out of time for some unforeseen reason.
#2: Most of the time, these surrender entries have an opponent. When they do, voters typically don't bash the entrant or call them a douchebag, they congratulate the other entrant as the winner and move on. In this case, Cringer had no clue his opponent was not going to post and had no control over whether his opponent would post or not. Hence, he should be treated no differently than if his opponent had posted.
#3: That said, after discussing the situation with Cringer, he has agreed to give up his spot to the highest vote percentage runner up from this round (standard practice for double no show fill ins). Technically he didn't have to do this by the current rules, but he did.
#4: I am currently discussing a rules change with the mods that will essentially treat future surrender type entries as no shows.
Good post and thank you for explaining this. BTW, can we look into adding "titles" to entries? Gracias!
The problem with this is the risk of 'non-english speaking' peoples accents showing through in my opinion...making it easier to identify artwork...
Also, in my opinion titles add a dynamic that takes away from the chop...often they are used to describe a chop and its story (I do this myself all the time). I think the image alone should be able to do all of that. Especially in the H2H, it should be chop v. chop, not chop and title v. chop and title.
_________________
Drifter.
|
shane.e.randall
Location: Indiana, PA
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 5:29 pm Reply with quote
Watch them Drift wrote: OneChiefRocker wrote: billtvshow wrote: Yarilo wrote: Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time " entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.
#1: People have been posting "surrender" entries for a long time, it has kind of been an accepted norm. Cringer was only doing what most people have done in the case that they ran out of time for some unforeseen reason.
#2: Most of the time, these surrender entries have an opponent. When they do, voters typically don't bash the entrant or call them a douchebag, they congratulate the other entrant as the winner and move on. In this case, Cringer had no clue his opponent was not going to post and had no control over whether his opponent would post or not. Hence, he should be treated no differently than if his opponent had posted.
#3: That said, after discussing the situation with Cringer, he has agreed to give up his spot to the highest vote percentage runner up from this round (standard practice for double no show fill ins). Technically he didn't have to do this by the current rules, but he did.
#4: I am currently discussing a rules change with the mods that will essentially treat future surrender type entries as no shows.
Good post and thank you for explaining this. BTW, can we look into adding "titles" to entries? Gracias!
The problem with this is the risk of 'non-english speaking' peoples accents showing through in my opinion...making it easier to identify artwork...
Also, in my opinion titles add a dynamic that takes away from the chop...often they are used to describe a chop and its story (I do this myself all the time). I think the image alone should be able to do all of that. Especially in the H2H, it should be chop v. chop, not chop and title v. chop and title.
Agreed, I vote no on Proposition 342-A.1.1 to add titles to the H2H contestant entries.
But I do believe Sen. Watch them drift's comment about "non-English speaking" peoples is politically incorrect.
He should have stated "Non Merican speaking" got dang aliens from outer space!
_________________ <iframe></iframe>
|
karlymango
Location: Manila, Philippines
|
Wed Aug 06, 2014 11:14 pm Reply with quote
I agree that round 2 rocks!!! I guess round three will be a war...
|
anfa
Location: Geordieland, UK
|
Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:59 am Reply with quote
shane.e.randall wrote: Watch them Drift wrote: OneChiefRocker wrote: billtvshow wrote: Yarilo wrote: Nice entries in round two. Lots of efforts, with exception of "Sorry, no time " entry. You are advancing into next round with no effort and shitty red letters. Congratulations, you are a winner of douchebag of the year award.
#1: People have been posting "surrender" entries for a long time, it has kind of been an accepted norm. Cringer was only doing what most people have done in the case that they ran out of time for some unforeseen reason.
#2: Most of the time, these surrender entries have an opponent. When they do, voters typically don't bash the entrant or call them a douchebag, they congratulate the other entrant as the winner and move on. In this case, Cringer had no clue his opponent was not going to post and had no control over whether his opponent would post or not. Hence, he should be treated no differently than if his opponent had posted.
#3: That said, after discussing the situation with Cringer, he has agreed to give up his spot to the highest vote percentage runner up from this round (standard practice for double no show fill ins). Technically he didn't have to do this by the current rules, but he did.
#4: I am currently discussing a rules change with the mods that will essentially treat future surrender type entries as no shows.
Good post and thank you for explaining this. BTW, can we look into adding "titles" to entries? Gracias!
The problem with this is the risk of 'non-english speaking' peoples accents showing through in my opinion...making it easier to identify artwork...
Also, in my opinion titles add a dynamic that takes away from the chop...often they are used to describe a chop and its story (I do this myself all the time). I think the image alone should be able to do all of that. Especially in the H2H, it should be chop v. chop, not chop and title v. chop and title.
Agreed, I vote no on Proposition 342-A.1.1 to add titles to the H2H contestant entries.
But I do believe Sen. Watch them drift's comment about "non-English speaking" peoples is politically incorrect.
He should have stated "Non Merican speaking" got dang aliens from outer space!
It's a bit early to be hitting the drink, mate. You have a problem. 
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 14, 15, 16 Next
Photoshop Contest Forum Index - Contests and Entries - The 2014 Head To Head Tournament - Reply to topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
