Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:57 pm   Reply with quote         

Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:25 pm   Reply with quote         

Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:31 pm   Reply with quote         

I was thinking that, if people don't click it big, then some entries are just gonna come across chunky, low res messes... which they arn't

Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:54 pm   Reply with quote         

Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:28 pm   Reply with quote         

Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:31 pm   Reply with quote         

Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:40 pm   Reply with quote         

Another fine example showing the reds suffering from artifacting significantly more than other solid colors - see Dino in lower left corner.
http://photoshopcontest.com/view-entry/108749/yabba-dabba-doo.html

I just couldn't resist to beat my own drum

Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:43 pm   Reply with quote         

vokaris wrote:

Ano

I just couldn't resist to beat my own drum

and most of us didn't know you had a drum

_________________
chopper with training wheels

Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:07 pm   Reply with quote         

Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:11 pm   Reply with quote         

well, my question is why does it compress it anyway (even if the compression ratio was lower)...
People are allready trying hard to keep the filesize limits (especially when you're non-advantage).

Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:43 pm   Reply with quote         

Grefix wrote:

well, my question is why does it compress it anyway (even if the compression ratio was lower)...
People are allready trying hard to keep the filesize limits (especially when you're non-advantage).

This applies to the resized 550px wide 'preview' images on the voting pages, I think the large (click for detail) versions are kept intact as submitted

Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:45 pm   Reply with quote         

vokaris wrote:

Grefix wrote:

well, my question is why does it compress it anyway (even if the compression ratio was lower)...
People are allready trying hard to keep the filesize limits (especially when you're non-advantage).

This applies to the resized 550px wide 'preview' images on the voting pages, I think the large (click for detail) versions are kept intact as submitted

exactly. But it's still a good question, because it never used to look so terrible.

Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:58 pm   Reply with quote         

vokaris wrote:

Grefix wrote:

well, my question is why does it compress it anyway (even if the compression ratio was lower)...
People are allready trying hard to keep the filesize limits (especially when you're non-advantage).

This applies to the resized 550px wide 'preview' images on the voting pages, I think the large (click for detail) versions are kept intact as submitted

hmm right there, I've mistake the fullsize directory with the large directory.. For a minute there I took them as the same

Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:45 pm   Reply with quote         

Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:45 am   Reply with quote