Voting has ended, but you can still leave a comment
Votes
|
Crispy
See comment #7
|
|
|
PocketWater
...
|
|
|
laurent24
great a water pic without sharks :-)
|
|
|
queen0fbats
.. and i am giving my last vote for the work on the splashing water ... although i still think the "shallow" factor applies
|
|
|
Janitor
nice use of multiple elements!
|
|
|
deshone
...
|
|
|
Serps
...
|
|
|
KaBooM
That's what I meant about the perspective. The water looks too shallow.
|
|
Comments
|
|
zeus-artwork
nice
|
|
|
|
KaBooM
Nice except the proportions are all wrong. That tail is WAY too big. Wouldn't the part underwater appear larger because of refraction, not vice versa?
|
|
|
vikas
Kaboom U R all Wrong......if you knew about perspective...then u should know when submerged the tip will be shorter and tail will appear big....coz a plane is not 2 or 3 meter long...it's big
|
|
|
|
queen0fbats
the perspective is ok ... but the water seems too shallow to accomodate the length of the airplane ... i think thats what doesnt make it look right
|
|
|
|
vikas
If my QOB says so then right she is....
|
|
|
paradoxia
author, you talk as if youve been here long, kaboom is my buddy, so dont mess with him, and QOB is all mine...sorry
|
|
|
|
Crispy
does it matter how long someone's here?? no. So no buddy bullshit.. Refraction has nothing to do with size, it only shifts the view.. Nice pic author, and I think commentor #4 is right..
|
|
|
|
vikas
sorry c#4....everybody is friends here...coz this is one great community..and sometimes tinsle tickle goes on but that doesn't mean kaboom is my enemy...he is as respectful as you and everybody else.....and don't worry u gor some competition here man...QO
|
|
|
|
queen0fbats
huh? i didnt know i was so popular :))) but no fighting, we're all buddies here and allowed to have differences of opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
[untitled entry]
|
by vikas
Created March 22, 2004
8 votes
9 comments
w x h (8,528KB)
389 views
|
|
|
Like this contest?
|
