|
maddhax0r
I'd like to see the original of the other photo you used.
|
|
|
danman
delivery.gettyimages.com...
|
|
|
nekro
and except that you removed the watermark ... what's original in this post???????
|
|
|
|
danman
Oh my friend if you had a photographers eye you woul see. Detail make the difference. For example the cover... see if you can find others :)
|
|
|
Hanzeeg72
I dunno. There a big difference between just adding a tiny amount of the original and calling it yours vs really putting work into something that looks convincingly authentic. Clean chop, but it looked that way before you did anything.
|
|
|
supak0ma
i can't see those details u talk about, theyre well hidden, maybe u can tell us?
|
|
|
Crispy
yeah and tell also where the source hides..
|
|
|
|
nekro
ok, i don't have "eye photograper" but you had to admit that, you know, i have the power of voting :)) and if you tell me where are the difference i'll vote, till that moment... i won't vote because it seems to be the same with that one from gettyimages.
|
|
|
|
nekro
try harder next time :)
|
|
|
|
Hanzeeg72
The only difference I see is the edge of the cover. Maybe the binding too. Subtle or insignificant? Either way, still no votes
|
|
|
cheezy
it looks like the edge of the book, the right edge, was altered - but, um, uh...
|
|
|
stl7dust
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
|
|
|
ScionShade
! didn't you people read what I wrote about the stinking fly? This is an excellently clean and good looking image. Author is getting ripped off here.
|
|
