Voting has ended, but you can still leave a comment
Votes
|
Robaccomando
nice change-up.
|
|
|
billtvshow
This is exceptionally good, I studied it a long time comparing to the source.
|
|
|
sage
indeed well done, good attention to details
|
|
|
Patre
I Like your change of perspective and the way you added some features and subtracted others..
|
|
|
koece
...
|
|
|
demasiadoman
very real looking shawn!
|
|
|
theduplicate
good shop !! nice !
|
|
|
DLowrie
...
|
|
|
|
MoZub
...
|
|
|
Melusky
excellent transition
|
|
|
Wett
I got pummmmled for something similar about 3 years ago... :D ... oh well, live and learn... oh yeah, nice find!
|
|
|
<senzotaku>
Last vote for this entry, good intergration :P
|
|
|
|
Nuttdriver
...
|
|
Comments
|
Alex
Mind showing the source? I think there's no chopping there... I found similar one on sxc.hu and on google. (bixby bridge)
|
|
|
Shawn Doremus
You're right, I didn't manipulate this image. Good google find don't you think?! Not trying to trick anyone, just brain dead on this one and this pic was too hard to pass up. Thanx for the votes everyone.
|
|
|
|
billtvshow
It's amazing how closely the original and even the background vegetation of the original matched up with that in the pic you used. That's why I gave you the benefit of the doubt. FYI, Using a pic with absolutely none of the "actual" source image is agai
|
|
|
|
Shawn Doremus
I know I'm a rule breaker. CHEATER. I should have taken the time to clone in some of the bushes or something. Lesson learned. Don't hate me.
|
|
|
|
MoZub
sneeky gumby!!
|
|
|
|
Alex
Nice find? Geez... This is not about photosearching Wett. Photoshopping. I found that pic and even a better one last week, but I'd never imagined someone would actually use it without even touching a single pixel. It's ok Shawn, you admit it. But why do p
|
|
|
|
|
[untitled entry]
|
by Shawn Doremus
Created May 11, 2005
14 votes
7 comments
550w x 361h (49KB)
1,172 views
|
|
|
Like this contest?
|
