Photoshop Contest PhotoshopContest.com
Creative Contests. Real Prizes. Essential Resource.
You are not logged in. Log in or Register

 


Photoshop Contest Forum Index - General Discussion - PSC Brother redesigns Canuckfish's site! - Reply to topic

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11

supak0ma

Location: Photoshop Nation

Post Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:50 am   Reply with quote         


ReinMan wrote:
BroChris wrote:
ReinMan wrote:
How do you do your roll overs? Do you happen to use DreamWeaver? If so, I might be able to assist you in removing the Flashing Annoying Buttons That Are The Root Of All Unrest With (un)God's Creatures.

In other words, how are you manifesting the roll overs, dude?


Nope, don't use Dreamweaver. I'm a hand coder Smile

Here's the issue: each button is made up of 3 images. One for the top, one for the bottom, and one that repeats to fill up the middle. I did it this way so that when there is more text in the button, it will simply make the button larger. The unsightly blink on hover is the vertical middle part covering up the bottom part for a split second. Can't figure out how to fix it. I may have to just create an image for each of the buttons. This actually might be the best solution, though I prefer to leave text as text, if you know what I mean.


Ah yes, you do seem to be suffering from CODER's REGRET! I do understand what you've done, but I definately would go the "hard button' way (being that I'm designer and coding causes me to get a rash on my arse shaped like Elvis).
I know the dial-up kids will cry, AND possilbly have to wait a few more moments to find out if they believe in God. But I suspect the Evil Axis Of Innapropriate Flashing Buttons will cause its own damage to site traffic. I say GO FORTH AND MAKE SEPARATE (yet solid) BUTTONS!

-------------

-To the rest of you, I apolagize if The Bro and I are disturbing your nice little chat! Very Happy

- I also appoligize for my speling Razz


use css rollovers, you only need 1 image.




Canuck <º)))><

Location: Dorchester, Ontario Canada

Post Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:37 am   Reply with quote         


Chopper wrote:

I believe Christianity is true also, but I also have tolerance of other people's beliefs. I work in the same cubicle as a devout Muslim. Do you know how chaotic it would be if I was not understanding of his viewpoint.

When you start tolerating other people's religions and viewpoints, I think what you may find is that you will become a better follower for Jesus. You will become more compassionate, just as Jesus was. You might even learn to convert someone based upon the loving and kindness of Jesus Christ, rather than the scare tactics of hell and damnation...or worse, the annoying "I'm right and you're wrong" mentality.


Look Chopper, I have Muslim friends, atheist friends, New Age friends...It is BECAUSE I have compassion for them that I made this site. Ask your Muslim cubicle mate if He thinks your views are right? Tolerance is accepting things you dislike or believe to be wrong. No-one tolerates ice cream Very Happy I accept anyone's right to be wrong.
Also, people do not convert people. Only God can do that.

Chopper wrote:

You have a limited number of options under each question. If the visitor wants to participate in your site, then to reach the "true content" of your website, you are forcing someone to choose based upon what YOU want them to choose. Personally, I feel each of your questions should have a hundred thousand buttons under them, but then it would just be easier to have a type="text" form field and let them enter their own response instead.


That would be like having a hundred thousand buttons under "What does 2 + 2 equal?
I'm not forcing anyone to choose anything. They are free to leave.


Canuck <º)))>< wrote:
Then what is your take on Romans 1 vs 18 -19 + Psalm 14 vs 1 for instance?


Chopper wrote:
I notice you leave out the verse just before in Romans 1 verse 17 which states:

"For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith."


That's cause I wanted your comments on the other verses, which you did not provide.
BTW, "The just shall live by faith in the righteousness of the God of Christianity," What did you think that meant?

Chopper wrote:
As I said, the topic of whether God exists or not is not a black/white issue. Believing in God is built upon faith. Faith is a very "grey" topic. We use our faith to make it a black/white issue for us "individually". Faith is based upon a subjective viewpoint and this makes it unproveable to anyone other than oneself based on our own unique observations and feelings.


Why is the question of God's existence not a black/white issue? Do you have faith that 2 + 2 = 4, or do you know it? I suspect that you know this because all other answers in base 10 mathematics would lead to absurdity.

Chopper wrote:

I am implying that not everyone here is a Christian that believes in the Bible. So you are going to have one hell of a frustrating time trying to convince non-believers of something that is only proveable based upon your own subjective, Biblical beliefs.


Like I have said many times, I am not trying to convince ANYONE of the OBJECTIVE facts that God exists, and that the Bible is true. I am merely stating them in the website that I wanted people here to critique for the LAYOUT.




_________________
"The atheist can’t find God for the same reason that a thief can’t find a policeman."
BroChris

Location: Louisville, KY

Post Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:31 am   Reply with quote         


supak0ma wrote:
use css rollovers, you only need 1 image.


That's what I did originally (before even showing the site off here), but I couldn't get the text positioned it the button right, since some text was longer than other and spanned varying amounts of lines. Then I went to a different css rollover method, using three images: one for the top, one for the bottom, and one for the middle. This is the method that you all saw when we reannounced the site with this thread, but it's also the method that caused a weird blink for IE 6.0. I've changed the buttons twice since then, and I'm sticking to what's there now. It works. I may us an image replacement technique so text remains text, but that would require me to define a different style for each button, again since they would be varying heights. So, probably not. I hope to at least define a rollover state.

That's probably more than anyone cared to read.

Any other suggestions for the site? I appreciate every comment made so far.
Canuck <º)))><

Location: Dorchester, Ontario Canada

Post Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:13 am   Reply with quote         


BroChris wrote:

Any other suggestions for the site? I appreciate every comment made so far.


That makes one of us Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing




_________________
"The atheist can’t find God for the same reason that a thief can’t find a policeman."
BroChris

Location: Louisville, KY

Post Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:04 pm   Reply with quote         


Canuck <º)))>< wrote:
That makes one of us Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing


lol, I was using an all-inclusive term for a subset of the entirety, referring only to those posts which were related to layout, colors, and graphics. Guess I should have clarified Smile
splodge

Location: Yorkshire,

Post Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:38 pm   Reply with quote         


dont look at me,,,,,, i said nothing




_________________


Hallcross Toots

Post Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:20 am   Reply with quote         






_________________

BroChris

Location: Louisville, KY

Post Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:41 pm   Reply with quote         


*bump

(just kidding!)

I fixed a few things with the site. Netscape and Opera show the header graphic now (they didn't before). They also position the menu correctly now, so that's a huge plus. Does anybody see anything else?
ScionShade

Location: VeniceFlaUS

Post Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:05 pm   Reply with quote         


Nice work bro.
Only thing left i ahve to offer is use of the term
"are material"....because it can have more than one meaning..
and each time I browsed through....I took it for the wrong meaning. Smile




Canuck <º)))><

Location: Dorchester, Ontario Canada

Post Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:11 pm   Reply with quote         


ScionShade wrote:
Nice work bro.
Only thing left i ahve to offer is use of the term
"are material"....because it can have more than one meaning..
and each time I browsed through....I took it for the wrong meaning. Smile


You mean saying 'are made of matter' would be better, or what did you have in mind?




_________________
"The atheist can’t find God for the same reason that a thief can’t find a policeman."
ScionShade

Location: VeniceFlaUS

Post Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:12 pm   Reply with quote         


Oh...the button w/ the choice...after ya agreed to the laws...
it's just a natural reaction...they are material in the sense that they are "real".
Sorry, but it got me at least 3 times Smile
Being from Jersey --the term immaterial means "it doesn't matter" and
material means it does matter and is relative.




Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11

Photoshop Contest Forum Index - General Discussion - PSC Brother redesigns Canuckfish's site! - Reply to topic

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Navigate PSC
Contests open  completed  winners  prizes  events  rules  rss 
Galleries votes  authentic  skillful  funny  creative  theme  winners 
Interact register  log in/out  forum  chat  user lookup  contact 
Stats monthly leaders  hall of fame  record holders 
PSC advantage  news (rss)  faq  about  links  contact  home 
Help faq  search  new users  tutorials  contact  password 

Adobe, the Adobe logo, Adobe Photoshop, Creative Suite and Illustrator are registered trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Text and images copyright © 2000-2006 Photoshop Contest. All rights reserved.
A venture of ExpertRating.com