Neither of your examples relevant. Neither are 'artistic nudes'
One could argue that Playboy is artistic nudity.
SO... Is this a PG site where kids, along with so called 'grown-ups' can participate? OR is it now an Adult NSFW nude artistic site like DeviantArt?
One my work has blocked, the other... Not yet.
One I show to my kids, the other... Not yet.
I in particular don't think the entry in question is vulgar or apple juice. I think its an awesome entry. But under the current rules, does it belong here? There in lies the problem. This site started and has gone on FOR YEARS as a non-nudity, kid friendly site. Where anything, including ass crack was deleted... even the word "P O R N" gets switched to "apple juice" here...
There is plenty of artistic nude stuff over at DeviantArt. I have no issues with it there... You have to sign-up as an adult +18 or as a child. Which will either entitle you to either view the nude 'art' entries or have it blocked out.
And yeah, I get that you can go to the art gallery and see the same thing, sometimes even worse... But that doesn't mean it 'has' to go on here...
Fact of the matter is, there are many here who have very strict work environments, which would end up either getting them fired, or at best, have the site (PSC) blocked from their servers.
It's not a matter of jealousy, its not a matter of knowing artistic from vulgar... Its not Hypocritical.
PSC has to either allow all nudity as a form of art, and make that statement known that this is a NOT SAFE FOR WORK website, or it needs to uphold its STRICT policy of NO Nudity. Artistic or otherwise.